Three "problems" called "2020 university entrance examination problem"

Three "problems" called "2020 university entrance examination problem"

The “2020 university entrance examination problem” is a problem faced by mid-1 of today. There are three kinds of problems.

The first is the problem of shifting from the question that chooses one correct answer from the options such as the University Entrance Examination Center Exam to the question that utilizes the thinking power of the descriptive and essay formulas.

The second reason is how to use one's head that chooses one correct answer in such a limited condition, and set the condition by yourself to rotate the head fully, so there is not one correct answer Writing with a high degree of freedom The question is whether to shift to the problem.

Third, there is a possibility that the "English test" may disappear in the "individual independent entrance examination of each university". Of course, this does not mean that the subject "English" will disappear. It means that the score of TOEFL, IELTS, or a private external qualification test will be attached to the application documents.

There is nothing to do with 4 skills, so it seems that “speaking” is added to “reading”, “listening”, and “writing” until now, but it is completely different. These "writing" and "speaking" have a high level of proficiency, and it is like feeling a essay or oral examination in Japanese. In other words, again, it is not a question that chooses one correct answer as it used to be, but more flexible essays and speaking skills that do not have one correct answer are required.

Is the three-level university entrance examination system, "high school basic academic ability test (tentative name)", "university applicants' academic ability evaluation test (tentative name)" and "unique individual entrance examination of each university", rational and fair as a system? Regarding the procedural theory, the working loops of many subcommittees, centering on the Central Education and Sleeping Council of MEXT, are in the process of discussion. Institutional conditions will continue to be twisted and twisted.

However, the changes without waiting are the above three shifts. If you put them all together, it will be a “paradigm shift of knowledge”. Eh, the paradigm shift now seems to readers to be anachronistic. It is the era of globalization. It is a time of turbulence. It is a time of anxiety. It is an era of uncertainty. It's said to be an unsolvable society.

However, the world of education was a robust vertical division, tree-structured organization, and the system of knowledge applicable to that organization was everything. Postmodernism, modern thought, hypercapitalism, cybercapitalism, tree structures and rhizomes were just materials for training reading literacy in modern Japanese.

However, in front of the 18-year-old election, junior and senior high school students not only understand the information given, but also critically think about the new idea and judge it  It became necessary to equip the theory of knowledge to change as a skill.

Right now, the field of education is chaotic. What kind of freedom will the university entrance examination questions pose to create an unknown world? What does global education bring to the world of education? If English is no longer a tool, and if it is set in the horizon of language and thinking, can English teachers who have been able to deal with it so far?

However, there is seed of hope in chaos. The “2020 College Entrance Examination Problem” is a paradoxical mechanism in which, together with the examinees, we consider the problems of creating chaos and at the same time solving chaos. The ability to think about this question is called "creative thinking through learning" in the next course of study.

 That is "Active Learning", which is the core of the next course of study. The core of this learning is dialogue. Dialogue paves the way for self-actualization by leveraging the potential of the students and the "self-axis" that is the feeling of what they are. The “2020 University Entrance Examination Problem” itself is a mechanism for not only memorizing objective knowledge as in the past, but also thinking and creating based on “self-axis”.

In this book, we boldly anticipate such questions and give examples of how we thought with students in the field of education. We hope that it will help promote the school's delayed knowledge paradigm shift.

Learn Communication in Active Learning'

☆ However, it can be said that it is a big ensemble of active learning these days

☆ To the degree of attention, communication is important in active learning,

☆ It ends with a "discourse" that is interactive or interactive.

☆ Even though it is highly interactive, extreme talk, hostile exchanges and hostile negotiations are possible,

☆ There is not much consideration.

☆ Of course, role play called a facilitator is emphasized

☆ Hostile communication cannot be seen.

☆ However, communication such as tuning pressure is often overlooked.

☆ About communication skills and mind

☆ Although many specialized books are published in mountains,

☆ Make them so compact

☆ And not just to introduce

☆ Written by Takada style.

☆ Of course in dialogue,

☆ In the area of   active learning

☆ This book will be a great reference as a clear methodology.